↓ Skip to main content

Corporate Portfolio Analysis Tools Revisited: Assessing Causes that May Explain Their Scholarly Disdain

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Management Reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Corporate Portfolio Analysis Tools Revisited: Assessing Causes that May Explain Their Scholarly Disdain
Published in
International Journal of Management Reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00316.x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 53 58%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 7%
Engineering 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2012.
All research outputs
#19,917,373
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Management Reviews
#399
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,497
of 172,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Management Reviews
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.