| Title |
Setting a baseline for global urban virome surveillance in sewage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-69869-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 12% |
| United States | 8 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
| Ireland | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 64% |
| Scientists | 22 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 59 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 73 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,061,117
of 34,517,774 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#11,116
of 184,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,969
of 453,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#256
of 3,909 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,909 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.