| Title |
New Zealand's COVID‐19 elimination strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Journal of Australia, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5694/mja2.50735 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 14% |
| United States | 15 | 14% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 93 | 86% |
| Scientists | 10 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 259 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 117 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 18% |
| Unknown | 123 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#199,453
of 34,626,533 outputs
Outputs from Medical Journal of Australia
#93
of 7,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,976
of 454,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Journal of Australia
#3
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,626,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.