You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantifying ecospace utilization and ecosystem engineering during the early Phanerozoic—The role of bioturbation and bioerosion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Advances, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abb0618 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luis A. Buatois, M. Gabriela Mángano, Nicholas J. Minter, Kai Zhou, Max Wisshak, Mark A. Wilson, Ricardo A. Olea |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 18% |
Canada | 2 | 18% |
Spain | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Japan | 1 | 9% |
Lithuania | 1 | 9% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
Argentina | 1 | 9% |
Brazil | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#614,610
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#4,145
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,292
of 426,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#181
of 543 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 543 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.