↓ Skip to main content

A Population Study of Childhood Maltreatment and Asthma Diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM), August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Population Study of Childhood Maltreatment and Asthma Diagnosis
Published in
Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM), August 2012
DOI 10.1097/psy.0b013e3182648de4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite growing evidence from longitudinal studies of a link between early-life stress and the development of asthma, very few of these examine one of the most severe types of early-life stress: childhood maltreatment. Cross-sectional studies on this topic have relied on retrospective self-reports of maltreatment. This study investigates associations between childhood maltreatment indicated by child protection agency records versus self-reports and lifetime asthma diagnosis in young adults, adjusting for socioeconomic status and mental disorders.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 33 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2014.
All research outputs
#21,403,195
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM)
#2,094
of 2,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,019
of 221,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM)
#17
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.