| Title |
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013699 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Anglemyer, Theresa Hm Moore, Lisa Parker, Timothy Chambers, Alice Grady, Kellia Chiu, Matthew Parry, Magdalena Wilczynska, Ella Flemyng, Lisa Bero |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 11% |
| United States | 15 | 10% |
| Spain | 13 | 8% |
| Canada | 13 | 8% |
| Australia | 7 | 5% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 105 | 68% |
| Scientists | 28 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 686 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 686 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 12% |
| Researcher | 64 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 99 | 14% |
| Unknown | 317 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 107 | 16% |
| Unknown | 334 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#284,699
of 34,567,073 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#484
of 14,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,940
of 455,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,567,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.