↓ Skip to main content

A unified call to action from Australian nursing and midwifery leaders: ensuring that Black lives matter

Overview of attention for article published in Contemporary Nurse, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 637)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
173 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Article details
Title
A unified call to action from Australian nursing and midwifery leaders: ensuring that Black lives matter
Published in
Contemporary Nurse, September 2020
DOI 10.1080/10376178.2020.1809107
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Geia, K. Baird, K. Bail, L. Barclay, J. Bennett, O. Best, M. Birks, L. Blackley, R. Blackman, A. Bonner, R. Bryant AO, C. Buzzacott, S. Campbell, C. Catling, C. Chamberlain, L. Cox, W. Cross, M. Cruickshank, A. Cummins, H. Dahlen, J. Daly, P. Darbyshire, P. Davidson, E. Denney-Wilson, R. De Souza, K. Doyle, A. Drummond, J. Duff, C. Duffield, T. Dunning, L. East, D. Elliott, R. Elmir, D. Fergie OAM, C. Ferguson, R. Fernandez, D. Flower, M. Foureur, C. Fowler, M. Fry, E. Gorman, J. Grant, J. Gray, E. Halcomb, B. Hart, D. Hartz, M. Hazelton, L. Heaton, L. Hickman, C. S. E. Homer AO, C. Hungerford, A. Hutton, D. Jackson AO, A. Johnson, M. A. Kelly, A. Kitson, S. Knight, T. Levett-Jones, D. Lindsay, R. Lovett, L. Luck, L. Molloy, E. Manias, J. Mannix, A. M. R. Marriott, M. Martin, D. Massey, A. McCloughen, S. McGough, L. McGrath, J. Mills, B. G. Mitchell, J. Mohamed, J. Montayre, T. Moroney, W. Moyle, L. Moxham, H. Northam OAM, S. Nowlan, A. P. O'Brien, O. Ogunsiji, C. Paterson, K. Pennington, K. Peters, J. Phillips, T. Power, N. Procter, L. Ramjan, N. Ramsay, B. Rasmussen, J. Rihari-Thomas, B. Rind, M. Robinson, M. Roche, K. Sainsbury, Y. Salamonson, J. Sherwood, L. Shields, J. Sim, I. Skinner, G. Smallwood, R. Smallwood, L. Stewart, S. Taylor, K. Usher, C. Virdun, J. Wannell, R. Ward, C. West, R. West, L. Wilkes, R. Williams, R. Wilson, D. Wynaden, R. Wynne

Abstract

Nurses and midwives of Australia now is the time for change! As powerfully placed, Indigenous and non-Indigenous nursing and midwifery professionals, together we can ensure an effective and robust Indigenous curriculum in our nursing and midwifery schools of education. Today, Australia finds itself in a shifting tide of social change, where the voices for better and safer health care ring out loud. Voices for justice, equity and equality reverberate across our cities, our streets, homes, and institutions of learning. It is a call for new songlines of reform. The need to embed meaningful Indigenous health curricula is stronger now than it ever was for Australian nursing and midwifery. It is essential that nursing and midwifery leadership continue to build an authentic collaborative environment for Indigenous curriculum development. Bipartisan alliance is imperative for all academic staff to be confident in their teaching and learning experiences with Indigenous health syllabus. This paper is a call out. Now is the time for Indigenous and non-Indigenous nurses and midwives to make a stand together, for justice and equity in our teaching, learning, and practice. Together we will dismantle systems, policy, and practices in health that oppress. The Black Lives Matter movement provides us with a 'now window' of accepted dialogue to build a better, culturally safe Australian nursing and midwifery workforce, ensuring that Black Lives Matter in all aspects of health care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history

Loading chart data

Monthly Attention Score data from August 2022 to July 2025. Daily data from 25 July 2025.

An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.

No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Lecturer 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 74 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 25%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 72 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#438,896
of 34,139,555 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Nurse
#3
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,029
of 456,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Nurse
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,139,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.