↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
14 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prevalence of Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus infection measured by antibodies to recombinant capsid protein and latent immunofluorescence antigen
Published in
The Lancet, October 1996
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07560-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), also known as human herpesvirus 8, may be the infectious cause of KS. Its prevalence in the general population, on the basis of detection of the virus genome, is controversial. To investigate the seroprevalence, we measured antibodies to a recombinant capsid-related (lytic cycle) KSHV antigen and a latent antigen complex. We selected potentially immunoreactive capsid-related proteins of KSHV by expressing them as recombinant proteins and testing them in western blot assays. We used a truncated recombinant protein encoded by KSHV open reading frame 65 (orf 65) to develop a diagnostic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and tested sera from HIV-infected individuals with KS, HIV-uninfected patients with "classic" KS, other HIV risk groups, and blood donors. We also compared the antibody response to this capsid-related protein to the response to latent antigen(s) in an immunofluorescence assay. 77/92 (84%) sera from KS patients reacted with the KSHV orf 65 protein and 84/103 (81.5%) reacted with KSHV latent antigen(s). The dominant immunogenic region of orf 65 is within the carboxyterminal 80 aminoacids, a region with little sequence similarity to the related Epstein-Barr virus, suggesting that orf 65 is a KSHV specific antigen. Only three sera from patients with haemophilia (1/84) or from intravenous drug users (2/63) had KSHV specific antibodies in the orf 65 assay whereas none of these sera reacted with latent antigen. Antibodies to KSHV were also infrequently found in UK and US blood donors by either assay (UK, 3/174 with orf 65 and 4/150 with latent antigen; US, 6/117 with orf 65 and 0/117 with latent antigen). They were more common among HIV-infected gay men without KS (5/16 by orf 65 ELISA, 10/33 by IFA), HIV-uninfected STD clinic attenders (14/166 by IFA), and Ugandan HIV-uninfected controls (6/17 by orf 65 ELISA, 9/17 by IFA). Antibody reactivity to the orf 65 protein (ELISA) and to latent antigen(s) (IFA) was concordant in 89% of 462 sera tested but reactive blood donor sera were discordant in both assays. Four AIDS-KS sera were unreactive in both assays. The distribution of antibodies to both a capsid-related recombinant protein and latent antigen(s) of KSHV strongly supports the view that infection with this virus is largely confined to individuals with, or at increased risk for, KS. However, infection with KSHV does occur, rarely, in the general UK and US population and is more common in Uganda. Antibodies to latent antigen(s) or to orf 65 encoded capsid protein will not detect all cases of KSHV infection, and a combination of several antigens will probably be required for accurate screening and confirmatory assays.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,533,269
of 34,271,801 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#14,903
of 51,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,169
of 39,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#37
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,271,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.