| Title |
Rethinking wastewater risks and monitoring in light of the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-020-00605-2 |
| Authors |
Anne Bogler, Aaron Packman, Alex Furman, Amit Gross, Ariel Kushmaro, Avner Ronen, Christophe Dagot, Colin Hill, Dalit Vaizel-Ohayon, Eberhard Morgenroth, Enrico Bertuzzo, George Wells, Hadas Raanan Kiperwas, Harald Horn, Ido Negev, Ines Zucker, Itay Bar-Or, Jacob Moran-Gilad, Jose Luis Balcazar, Kyle Bibby, Menachem Elimelech, Noam Weisbrod, Oded Nir, Oded Sued, Osnat Gillor, Pedro J. Alvarez, Sandra Crameri, Shai Arnon, Sharon Walker, Sima Yaron, Thanh H. Nguyen, Yakir Berchenko, Yunxia Hu, Zeev Ronen, Edo Bar-Zeev |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 508 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 89 | 18% |
| France | 19 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 17 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 14 | 3% |
| Japan | 11 | 2% |
| Mexico | 10 | 2% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 87 | 17% |
| Unknown | 228 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 434 | 85% |
| Scientists | 50 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 501 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 79 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 75 | 15% |
| Unknown | 170 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 65 | 13% |
| Engineering | 55 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 86 | 17% |
| Unknown | 202 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 609. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#47,380
of 34,599,069 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#51
of 1,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,484
of 455,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,599,069 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.