↓ Skip to main content

The inhibition of iridium-promoted water oxidation catalysis (WOC) by cucurbit[ n ]urils

Overview of attention for article published in Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The inhibition of iridium-promoted water oxidation catalysis (WOC) by cucurbit[ n ]urils
Published in
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2012
DOI 10.1039/c2dt31363d
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wissam Iali, Predrag Petrović, Michel Pfeffer, Stefan Grimme, Jean-Pierre Djukic

Abstract

A series of iridacycles bearing π-bonded moieties of variable electron-withdrawing capabilities were tested for their ability to promote water oxidation catalysis (WOC) in the presence of high loading in a sacrificial oxidant, under conditions chosen for optimal dioxygen production. This report shows that none of these complexes performs differently than monometallic iridacycles and that the π-bonded moiety does not affect the overall rate of O(2) production. Furthermore, it is shown that cucurbituril macrocycles significantly inhibit the production of dioxygen independently of the nature of the Cp*Ir(III)-based catalyst used to perform WOC. Theoretical first-principles based DFT-D3 investigations including a complete treatment of solvation with COSMO and COSMO-RS treatments supported by ITC analyses suggest that concealment of the catalyst by curcurbit[7]uril could occur by non-covalent interaction of the Cp*Ir moiety in the hydrophobic pocket of the cavitand. For other cavitands of smaller inner cavity diameter, inclusion may not be the main mode of inhibition. Assuming the intervention of the putative Ir(IV)-oxyl biradical of a Cp*Ir(IV)(O)(H(2)O)(2) species like suggested by many authors, inhibition of WOC by inclusion would probably result from unfavourable coulombic interactions between water and the inclusion complex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 38%
Researcher 6 19%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 81%
Materials Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2012.
All research outputs
#23,109,385
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#12,535
of 21,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,358
of 251,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#184
of 677 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 677 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.