↓ Skip to main content

創造的ワークショップのための手法と成功要因の研究

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Creativity Society, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
創造的ワークショップのための手法と成功要因の研究
Published in
Journal of Japan Creativity Society, April 2019
DOI 10.24578/japancreativity.22.0_53
Authors

安松 健

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#14,924,082
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Creativity Society
#2
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,853
of 364,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Creativity Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them