↓ Skip to main content

Promiscuous or discriminating: Has the favored mRNA target of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein been overlooked?

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Promiscuous or discriminating: Has the favored mRNA target of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein been overlooked?
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1607665113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 33%
Neuroscience 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Chemistry 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 3 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,441,724
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#44,587
of 118,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,767
of 344,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#476
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.