↓ Skip to main content

Manual physical therapy and exercise versus electrophysical agents and exercise in the management of plantar heel pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
570 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Manual physical therapy and exercise versus electrophysical agents and exercise in the management of plantar heel pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, August 2009
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2009.3036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua A Cleland, J Haxby Abbott, Martin O Kidd, Steve Stockwell, Sheryl Cheney, David F Gerrard, Timothy W Flynn

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 570 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 552 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 105 18%
Other 78 14%
Student > Master 73 13%
Student > Postgraduate 68 12%
Student > Bachelor 50 9%
Other 106 19%
Unknown 90 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 259 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 137 24%
Sports and Recreations 30 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Social Sciences 4 <1%
Other 26 5%
Unknown 102 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,470,313
of 34,601,261 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#466
of 2,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,233
of 173,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.