↓ Skip to main content

Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan: results of pre-COVID and COVID-19…

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Global Health Journal, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
885 Mendeley
Title
Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan: results of pre-COVID and COVID-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements
Published in
BMJ Global Health Journal, August 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Syed A K Shifat Ahmed, Motunrayo Ajisola, Kehkashan Azeem, Pauline Bakibinga, Yen-Fu Chen, Nazratun Nayeem Choudhury, Olufunke Fayehun, Frances Griffiths, Bronwyn Harris, Peter Kibe, Richard J Lilford, Akinyinka Omigbodun, Narjis Rizvi, Jo Sartori, Simon Smith, Samuel I Watson, Ria Wilson, Godwin Yeboah, Navneet Aujla, Syed Iqbal Azam, Peter J Diggle, Paramjit Gill, Romaina Iqbal, Caroline Kabaria, Lyagamula Kisia, Catherine Kyobutungi, Jason J Madan, Blessing Mberu, Shukri F Mohamed, Ahsana Nazish, Oladoyin Odubanjo, Mary E Osuh, Eme Owoaje, Oyinlola Oyebode, Joao Porto de Albuquerque, Omar Rahman, Komal Tabani, Olalekan John Taiwo, Grant Tregonning, Olalekan A Uthman, Rita Yusuf, On behalf of the Improving Health in Slums Collaborative

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 885 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 885 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 122 14%
Researcher 99 11%
Student > Bachelor 72 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 5%
Other 39 4%
Other 149 17%
Unknown 359 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 168 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 10%
Social Sciences 76 9%
Psychology 21 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 2%
Other 123 14%
Unknown 387 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#436,548
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Global Health Journal
#231
of 3,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,118
of 428,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Global Health Journal
#12
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.