| Title |
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection among healthcare workers – What is the evidence?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International journal of clinical practice, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ijcp.13617 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 93 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,007,582
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from International journal of clinical practice
#645
of 3,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,464
of 455,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International journal of clinical practice
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.