↓ Skip to main content

Epistasis from functional dependence of fitness on underlying traits

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Epistasis from functional dependence of fitness on underlying traits
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2012
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.1449
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Epistasis between mutations in two genes is thought to reflect an interdependence of their functions. While sometimes epistasis is predictable using mechanistic models, its roots seem, in general, hidden in the complex architecture of biological networks. Here, we ask how epistasis can be quantified based on the mathematical dependence of a system-level trait (e.g. fitness) on lower-level traits (e.g. molecular or cellular properties). We first focus on a model in which fitness is the difference between a benefit and a cost trait, both pleiotropically affected by mutations. We show that despite its simplicity, this model can be used to analytically predict certain properties of the ensuing distribution of epistasis, such as a global negative bias, resulting in antagonism between beneficial mutations, and synergism between deleterious ones. We next extend these ideas to derive a general expression for epistasis given an arbitrary functional dependence of fitness on other traits. This expression demonstrates how epistasis relative to fitness can emerge despite the absence of epistasis relative to lower level traits, leading to a formalization of the concept of independence between biological processes. Our results suggest that epistasis may be largely shaped by the pervasiveness of pleiotropic effects and modular organization in biological networks.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Belgium 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 85 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2012.
All research outputs
#17,587,560
of 27,376,552 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#10,451
of 11,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,023
of 191,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#79
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,376,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.