| Title |
Disparities in the excess risk of mortality in the first wave of COVID-19: Cross sectional study of the English sentinel network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Infection, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.08.037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon de Lusignan, Mark Joy, Jason Oke, Dylan McGagh, Brian Nicholson, James Sheppard, Oluwafunmi Akinyemi, Gayatri Amirthalingam, Kevin Brown, Rachel Byford, Gavin Dabrera, Else Krajenbrink, Harshana Liyanage, Jamie LopezBernal, Cecilia Okusi, Mary Ramsay, Julian Sherlock, Mary Sinnathamby, Ruby S M Tsang, Victoria Tzortziou Brown, John Williams, Maria Zambon, Filipa Ferreira, Gary Howsam, F D Richard Hobbs |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 58% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 65 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,194,239
of 32,185,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infection
#479
of 3,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,894
of 441,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infection
#24
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,185,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.