↓ Skip to main content

Effects of two training curricula on basic laparoscopic skills and surgical performance among veterinarians.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of two training curricula on basic laparoscopic skills and surgical performance among veterinarians.
Published in
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, August 2012
DOI 10.2460/javma.241.4.451
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To compare laparoscopic skills among veterinarians before and after undertaking 1 of 2 programs of simulation training.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 14%
Lecturer 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 41%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2012.
All research outputs
#17,252,457
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
#2,735
of 4,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,682
of 186,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
#24
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.