↓ Skip to main content

Revealing the paradox of drug reward in human evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Revealing the paradox of drug reward in human evolution
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2008
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2007.1673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Italy 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Chile 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 231 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 20%
Researcher 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 15%
Student > Master 34 13%
Other 14 5%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 27 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 37%
Psychology 31 12%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Environmental Science 10 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 36 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2026.
All research outputs
#1,586,332
of 33,043,360 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3,243
of 12,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,703
of 130,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#12
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,043,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.