| Title |
Monocyte activation in systemic Covid-19 infection: Assay and rationale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EBioMedicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102964 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Germany | 2 | 22% |
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 76 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,959,055
of 30,990,086 outputs
Outputs from EBioMedicine
#2,440
of 4,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,729
of 436,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EBioMedicine
#76
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,990,086 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.