↓ Skip to main content

Influences in fertility decisions among HIV-infected individuals in Lilongwe, Malawi: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Influences in fertility decisions among HIV-infected individuals in Lilongwe, Malawi: a qualitative study
Published in
BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, June 2016
DOI 10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101395
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The motivation to have a child may be complex with numerous influencing factors, particularly among individuals living with HIV. This study sought to understand factors influencing fertility decision-making for HIV-infected men and women in Lilongwe, Malawi. Thirteen focus groups were conducted among HIV-infected individuals enrolled in antiretroviral treatment services. Participants identified a hierarchy of influences in fertility decisions including the importance of childbearing, patriarchal influence, family influences and concern regarding HIV transmission. Addressing fertility conversations beyond the confines of a relationship may be important, as family plays a significant role in fertility choices. Childbearing remains a fundamental desire among many individuals with HIV; however, concerns regarding transmission risk need to be addressed with efforts made to overcome misconception and assist individuals in balancing what may be competing influences.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 17 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#9,599,076
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health
#616
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,198
of 326,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.