↓ Skip to main content

Physician assistants in English primary care teams: A survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interprofessional Care, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Physician assistants in English primary care teams: A survey
Published in
Journal of Interprofessional Care, May 2012
DOI 10.3109/13561820.2012.686538
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ensuring that health care teams have a mix of skilled professionals to meet patient need, safely and effectively, is a priority in all health services. The United Kingdom, like a number of other countries, have been exploring the contribution physician assistants, who are well established in the United States of America, can make to health care teams including primary care. This study investigated the employment of physician assistants in English primary care and their contribution through an electronic, self report, survey. Sixteen physician assistants responded, who were working in a variety of types of general practice teams. A range of activities were reported but the greatest proportion of their time was described as seeing patients in booked surgery appointments for same day/urgent appointments. The scope of the survey was limited and questions remain as to patient and professional responses to a new professional group within English primary care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Librarian 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Psychology 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,249,959
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interprofessional Care
#876
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,484
of 163,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interprofessional Care
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.