↓ Skip to main content

Geographic Differences in the Contribution of ubiA Mutations to High-Level Ethambutol Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Geographic Differences in the Contribution of ubiA Mutations to High-Level Ethambutol Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published in
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2016
DOI 10.1128/aac.03002-15
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ethambutol (EMB) resistance can evolve through a multi-step process, and mutations in the ubiA (Rv3806c) gene appear to be responsible for high-level EMB-resistance in M. tuberculosis We evaluated the prevalence of ubiA and embB (Rv3795) mutations in EMB-resistant strains originating from Africa and South Korea. No differences in embB mutation frequencies were observed between strains from both origins. However, ubiA mutations were present in 45.5% ±6.5% of the African EMB-resistant isolates but in only 9.5% ±1.5% of the South Korean EMB-resistant isolates. The ubiA mutations associated with EMB-resistance were localized to the trans-membrane domains of the encoded protein, whereas the embB mutations are localized in the extra-membrane domains. Larger studies are needed to investigate the causes of increased ubiA mutations as a pathway to high-level EMB-resistance in African countries, such as extended EMB usage during tuberculosis treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2017.
All research outputs
#29,286,279
of 32,463,143 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#17,374
of 18,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,413
of 336,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#239
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,463,143 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.