↓ Skip to main content

Characterization and function of the human macrophage dopaminergic system: implications for CNS disease and drug abuse

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Characterization and function of the human macrophage dopaminergic system: implications for CNS disease and drug abuse
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-9-203
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Perivascular macrophages and microglia are critical to CNS function. Drugs of abuse increase extracellular dopamine in the CNS, exposing these cells to elevated levels of dopamine. In rodent macrophages and human T-cells, dopamine was shown to modulate cellular functions through activation of dopamine receptors and other dopaminergic proteins. The expression of these proteins and the effects of dopamine on human macrophage functions had not been studied.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2025.
All research outputs
#4,849,097
of 33,507,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#954
of 3,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,708
of 219,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#5
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,507,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.