↓ Skip to main content

Studying RNA Homology and Conservation with Infernal: From Single Sequences to RNA Families

Overview of attention for article published in Current protocols in bioinformatics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Studying RNA Homology and Conservation with Infernal: From Single Sequences to RNA Families
Published in
Current protocols in bioinformatics, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/cpbi.4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Emerging high-throughput technologies have led to a deluge of putative non-coding RNA (ncRNA) sequences identified in a wide variety of organisms. Systematic characterization of these transcripts will be a tremendous challenge. Homology detection is critical to making maximal use of functional information gathered about ncRNAs: identifying homologous sequence allows us to transfer information gathered in one organism to another quickly and with a high degree of confidence. ncRNA presents a challenge for homology detection, as the primary sequence is often poorly conserved and de novo secondary structure prediction and search remain difficult. This unit introduces methods developed by the Rfam database for identifying "families" of homologous ncRNAs starting from single "seed" sequences, using manually curated sequence alignments to build powerful statistical models of sequence and structure conservation known as covariance models (CMs), implemented in the Infernal software package. We provide a step-by-step iterative protocol for identifying ncRNA homologs and then constructing an alignment and corresponding CM. We also work through an example for the bacterial small RNA MicA, discovering a previously unreported family of divergent MicA homologs in genus Xenorhabdus in the process. © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Master 7 17%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 24%
Computer Science 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#31,416,841
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Current protocols in bioinformatics
#192
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,264
of 345,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current protocols in bioinformatics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.