| Title |
Manifesto for healthcare simulation practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000712 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine S Park, Louise Clark, Grace Gephardt, Jamie M Robertson, Jane Miller, Dayna K Downing, Bee Leng Sabrina Koh, Kellie D Bryant, David Grant, Dinker R Pai, Jesika S Gavilanes, Edgar Israel Herrera Bastida, Li Li, Keith Littlewood, Eliana Escudero, Michelle Ann Kelly, Debra Nestel, Jan-Joost Rethans |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 31% |
| Canada | 7 | 7% |
| Australia | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 58% |
| Scientists | 26 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#714,836
of 34,528,520 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
#5
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,698
of 454,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,528,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.