↓ Skip to main content

Transmission of influenza reflects seasonality of wild birds across the annual cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transmission of influenza reflects seasonality of wild birds across the annual cycle
Published in
Ecology Letters, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/ele.12629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nichola J Hill, Eric J Ma, Brandt W Meixell, Mark S Lindberg, Walter M Boyce, Jonathan A Runstadler

Abstract

Influenza A Viruses (IAV) in nature must overcome shifting transmission barriers caused by the mobility of their primary host, migratory wild birds, that change throughout the annual cycle. Using a phylogenetic network of viral sequences from North American wild birds (2008-2011) we demonstrate a shift from intraspecific to interspecific transmission that along with reassortment, allows IAV to achieve viral flow across successive seasons from summer to winter. Our study supports amplification of IAV during summer breeding seeded by overwintering virus persisting locally and virus introduced from a wide range of latitudes. As birds migrate from breeding sites to lower latitudes, they become involved in transmission networks with greater connectivity to other bird species, with interspecies transmission of reassortant viruses peaking during the winter. We propose that switching transmission dynamics may be a critical strategy for pathogens that infect mobile hosts inhabiting regions with strong seasonality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 97 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 22%
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 34%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 14%
Environmental Science 12 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,610,468
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#1,699
of 3,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,010
of 360,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#31
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.