Validity of two common asthma-specific quality of life questionnaires: Juniper mini asthma quality of life questionnaire and Sydney asthma quality of life questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2012

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter: 3 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 87 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Validity of two common asthma-specific quality of life questionnaires: Juniper mini asthma quality of life questionnaire and Sydney asthma quality of life questionnaire
Published in	Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2012
DOI	10.1186/1477-7525-10-97
Pubmed ID	22906054
Authors	Christian Joachim Apfelbacher, Christina Jones, Matthew Hankins, Helen Smith
Abstract	This study explored the psychometric properties (internal consistency, construct validity, discriminative ability) of the Juniper Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini AQLQ-J) and the Sydney Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-S).

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	2	67%
United States	1	33%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	3	100%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Turkey	1	1%
United Kingdom	1	1%
France	1	1%
Germany	1	1%
Unknown	83	95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	15	17%
Student > Doctoral Student	9	10%
Researcher	9	10%
Other	7	8%
Student > Bachelor	6	7%
Other	13	15%
Unknown	28	32%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	34	39%
Nursing and Health Professions	6	7%
Psychology	5	6%
Social Sciences	4	5%
Environmental Science	2	2%
Other	6	7%
Unknown	30	34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2012.

All research outputs

#16,740,040

of 26,368,346 outputs

Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

#1,298

of 2,296 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#117,273

of 188,080 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

#14

of 28 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 26,368,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.

So far Altmetric has tracked 2,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.