↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genomewide meta‐analysis identifies loci associated with IGF‐I and IGFBP‐3 levels with impact on age‐related traits
Published in
Aging Cell, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/acel.12490
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Teumer, Qibin Qi, Maria Nethander, Hugues Aschard, Stefania Bandinelli, Marian Beekman, Sonja I. Berndt, Martin Bidlingmaier, Linda Broer, CHARGE Longevity Working Group, Anne Cappola, Gian Paolo Ceda, Stephen Chanock, Ming‐Huei Chen, Tai C. Chen, Yii‐Der Ida Chen, Jonathan Chung, Fabiola Del Greco Miglianico, Joel Eriksson, Luigi Ferrucci, Nele Friedrich, Carsten Gnewuch, Mark O. Goodarzi, Niels Grarup, Tingwei Guo, Elke Hammer, Richard B. Hayes, Andrew A. Hicks, Albert Hofman, Jeanine J. Houwing‐Duistermaat, Frank Hu, David J. Hunter, Lise L. Husemoen, Aaron Isaacs, Kevin B. Jacobs, Joop A. M. J. L. Janssen, John‐Olov Jansson, Nico Jehmlich, Simon Johnson, Anders Juul, Magnus Karlsson, Tuomas O. Kilpelainen, Peter Kovacs, Peter Kraft, Chao Li, Allan Linneberg, Yongmei Liu, Ruth J. F. Loos, Body Composition Genetics Consortium, Mattias Lorentzon, Yingchang Lu, Marcello Maggio, Reedik Magi, James Meigs, Dan Mellström, Matthias Nauck, Anne B. Newman, Michael N. Pollak, Peter P. Pramstaller, Inga Prokopenko, Bruce M. Psaty, Martin Reincke, Eric B. Rimm, Jerome I. Rotter, Aude Saint Pierre, Claudia Schurmann, Sudha Seshadri, Klara Sjögren, P. Eline Slagboom, Howard D. Strickler, Michael Stumvoll, Yousin Suh, Qi Sun, Cuilin Zhang, Johan Svensson, Toshiko Tanaka, Archana Tare, Anke Tönjes, Hae‐Won Uh, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Diana van Heemst, Liesbeth Vandenput, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Uwe Völker, Sara M. Willems, Claes Ohlsson, Henri Wallaschofski, Robert C. Kaplan

Abstract

The growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis can be manipulated in animal models to promote longevity, and IGF-related proteins including IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) have also been implicated in risk of human diseases including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer. Through genomewide association study of up to 30 884 adults of European ancestry from 21 studies, we confirmed and extended the list of previously identified loci associated with circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations (IGF1, IGFBP3, GCKR, TNS3, GHSR, FOXO3, ASXL2, NUBP2/IGFALS, SORCS2, and CELSR2). Significant sex interactions, which were characterized by different genotype-phenotype associations between men and women, were found only for associations of IGFBP-3 concentrations with SNPs at the loci IGFBP3 and SORCS2. Analyses of SNPs, gene expression, and protein levels suggested that interplay between IGFBP3 and genes within the NUBP2 locus (IGFALS and HAGH) may affect circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations. The IGF-I-decreasing allele of SNP rs934073, which is an eQTL of ASXL2, was associated with lower adiposity and higher likelihood of survival beyond 90 years. The known longevity-associated variant rs2153960 (FOXO3) was observed to be a genomewide significant SNP for IGF-I concentrations. Bioinformatics analysis suggested enrichment of putative regulatory elements among these IGF-I- and IGFBP-3-associated loci, particularly of rs646776 at CELSR2. In conclusion, this study identified several loci associated with circulating IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations and provides clues to the potential role of the IGF axis in mediating effects of known (FOXO3) and novel (ASXL2) longevity-associated loci.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor 10 7%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2025.
All research outputs
#2,418,967
of 29,149,839 outputs
Outputs from Aging Cell
#774
of 2,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,556
of 324,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Cell
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,149,839 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.