↓ Skip to main content

One-Year Outcomes of Prenatal Exposure to MDMA and Other Recreational Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
10 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
One-Year Outcomes of Prenatal Exposure to MDMA and Other Recreational Drugs
Published in
Pediatrics, September 2012
DOI 10.1542/peds.2012-0666
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A widely used illicit recreational drug among young adults, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or ecstasy, is an indirect monoaminergic agonist/reuptake inhibitor affecting the serotonin system. Preclinical studies found prenatal exposure related to long-term learning and memory impairments. There are no studies of sequelae of prenatal MDMA exposure in humans, despite potential harmful effects to the fetus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 64 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 20%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 70 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2026.
All research outputs
#2,217,943
of 32,909,039 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#5,629
of 22,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,552
of 217,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#52
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,909,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.