↓ Skip to main content

Modularity as a source of new morphological variation in the mandible of hybrid mice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Modularity as a source of new morphological variation in the mandible of hybrid mice
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-141
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hybridization is often seen as a process dampening phenotypic differences accumulated between diverging evolutionary units. For a complex trait comprising several relatively independent modules, hybridization may however simply generate new phenotypes, by combining into a new mosaic modules inherited from each parental groups and parts intermediate with respect to the parental groups. We tested this hypothesis by studying mandible size and shape in a set of first and second generation hybrids resulting from inbred wild-derived laboratory strains documenting two subspecies of house mice, Musmusculus domesticus and Musmusculus musculus. Phenotypic variation of the mandible was divided into nested partitions of developmental, evolutionary and functional modules.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Professor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2012.
All research outputs
#24,755,224
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,917
of 3,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,820
of 220,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#42
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.