To demonstrate possible flow artifacts when imaging drusen with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).
Patients with drusen were enrolled in a prospective OCT study using the Zeiss AngioPlex OCTA instrument (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Two kinds of en face slabs were created for visualizing both structure and flow. The first slab followed the contour of Bruch's membrane. The second slab had an inner boundary following the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) contour and an outer boundary following the contour of Bruch's membrane. The structure and flow signals from within the drusen were compared.
Eleven eyes of nine patients with age-related macular degeneration and drusen were imaged. In all 11 eyes, an artifactual flow signal was seen on the first slab where it intersected the RPE. This flow signal was a projection artifact from the overlying retinal vessels. The second slab did not show evidence of flow within drusen.
OCTA decorrelation projection artifacts can be misinterpreted as apparent flow within drusen if the slab region includes hyperreflective boundary layers such as the RPE. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:517-522.].
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,204,359
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
#582
of 1,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,335
of 339,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
#14
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
