↓ Skip to main content

Non-Dipping and Cardiometabolic Profile: A Study on Normotensive Overweight Middle-Aged Men

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, Lung & Circulation, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Non-Dipping and Cardiometabolic Profile: A Study on Normotensive Overweight Middle-Aged Men
Published in
Heart, Lung & Circulation, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.04.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We aimed to assess insulin sensitivity and other metabolic features of dippers and non-dippers among overweight middle-aged men. We studied 73 men (45.8 ± 5.3 years) who were overweight but normotensive. Participants were separated into dippers and non-dippers based on the magnitude of the nocturnal decline of blood pressure, with dippers experiencing an overnight decline ≥10% as per standard definition. Our study included 51 dippers and 22 non-dippers. All participants underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the Matsuda method from an oral glucose tolerance test; other assessments included carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT), body composition derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, lipid profiles, and a physical activity questionnaire. Non-dippers had lower daytime systolic (-5.0mmHg; p=0.022) and diastolic (-3.3mmHg; p=0.035) blood pressure than dippers. Conversely, during sleep, non-dippers had higher systolic (+6.5mmHg; p=0.003) and diastolic (+5.6mmHg; p=0.001) blood pressure. In continuous associations, increasing CIMT was associated with decreasing systolic (p=0.012) and diastolic (p=0.042) dipping. Thus, non-dippers had CIMT that was 9% greater than that of dippers (749 vs 820μm; p=0.036). Importantly, there was no association between non-dipping status or the magnitude of the nocturnal dip with insulin sensitivity. Non-dippers had lower blood pressure in the daytime, but higher blood pressure in the night time compared to dippers. Non-dippers had increased CIMT, which suggests that normotensive men with a non-dipping ambulatory blood pressure profile may be at increased cardiovascular risk. However, it appears that the non-dipping profile is unrelated to dysfunction of glucose homeostasis in overweight normotensive men.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 19 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 36%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#31,227,209
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Heart, Lung & Circulation
#1,661
of 1,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,436
of 340,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart, Lung & Circulation
#27
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.