↓ Skip to main content

A Quantitative Proteome Map of the Human Body

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
831 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Quantitative Proteome Map of the Human Body
Published in
Cell, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lihua Jiang, Meng Wang, Shin Lin, Ruiqi Jian, Xiao Li, Joanne Chan, Guanlan Dong, Huaying Fang, Aaron E. Robinson, GTEx Consortium, François Aguet, Shankara Anand, Kristin G. Ardlie, Stacey Gabriel, Gad Getz, Aaron Graubert, Kane Hadley, Robert E. Handsaker, Katherine H. Huang, Seva Kashin, Daniel G. MacArthur, Samuel R. Meier, Jared L. Nedzel, Duyen Y. Nguyen, Ayellet V. Segrè, Ellen Todres, Brunilda Balliu, Alvaro N. Barbeira, Alexis Battle, Rodrigo Bonazzola, Andrew Brown, Christopher D. Brown, Stephane E. Castel, Don Conrad, Daniel J. Cotter, Nancy Cox, Sayantan Das, Olivia M. de Goede, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, Barbara E. Engelhardt, Eleazar Eskin, Tiffany Y. Eulalio, Nicole M. Ferraro, Elise Flynn, Laure Fresard, Eric R. Gamazon, Diego Garrido-Martín, Nicole R. Gay, Roderic Guigó, Andrew R. Hamel, Yuan He, Paul J. Hoffman, Farhad Hormozdiari, Lei Hou, Hae Kyung Im, Brian Jo, Silva Kasela, Manolis Kellis, Sarah Kim-Hellmuth, Alan Kwong, Tuuli Lappalainen, Xin Li, Yanyu Liang, Serghei Mangul, Pejman Mohammadi, Stephen B. Montgomery, Manuel Muñoz-Aguirre, Daniel C. Nachun, Andrew B. Nobel, Meritxell Oliva, YoSon Park, Yongjin Park, Princy Parsana, Ferran Reverter, John M. Rouhana, Chiara Sabatti, Ashis Saha, Andrew D. Skol, Matthew Stephens, Barbara E. Stranger, Benjamin J. Strober, Nicole A. Teran, Ana Viñuela, Gao Wang, Xiaoquan Wen, Fred Wright, Valentin Wucher, Yuxin Zou, Pedro G. Ferreira, Li, Marta Melé, Esti Yeger-Lotem, Mary E. Barcus, Debra Bradbury, Tanya Krubit, Jeffrey A. McLean, Liqun Qi, Karna Robinson, Nancy V. Roche, Anna M. Smith, Leslie Sobin, David E. Tabor, Anita Undale, Jason Bridge, Lori E. Brigham, Barbara A. Foster, Bryan M. Gillard, Richard Hasz, Marcus Hunter, Christopher Johns, Mark Johnson, Ellen Karasik, Gene Kopen, William F. Leinweber, Alisa McDonald, Michael T. Moser, Kevin Myer, Kimberley D. Ramsey, Brian Roe, Saboor Shad, Jeffrey A. Thomas, Gary Walters, Michael Washington, Joseph Wheeler, Scott D. Jewell, Daniel C. Rohrer, Dana R. Valley, David A. Davis, Deborah C. Mash, Philip A. Branton, Laura K. Barker, Heather M. Gardiner, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura A. Siminoff, Paul Flicek, Maximilian Haeussler, Thomas Juettemann, W. James Kent, Christopher M. Lee, Conner C. Powell, Kate R. Rosenbloom, Magali Ruffier, Dan Sheppard, Kieron Taylor, Stephen J. Trevanion, Daniel R. Zerbino, Nathan S. Abell, Joshua Akey, Lin Chen, Kathryn Demanelis, Jennifer A. Doherty, Andrew P. Feinberg, Kasper D. Hansen, Peter F. Hickey, Farzana Jasmine, Rajinder Kaul, Muhammad G. Kibriya, Jin Billy Li, Qin Li, Sandra E. Linder, Brandon L. Pierce, Lindsay F. Rizzardi, Kevin S. Smith, John Stamatoyannopoulos, Hua Tang, Latarsha J. Carithers, Ping Guan, Susan E. Koester, A. Roger Little, Helen M. Moore, Concepcion R. Nierras, Abhi K. Rao, Jimmie B. Vaught, Simona Volpi, Michael P. Snyder

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 575 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 831 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 831 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 183 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 137 16%
Student > Bachelor 56 7%
Student > Master 48 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 4%
Other 128 15%
Unknown 246 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 256 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 5%
Neuroscience 32 4%
Chemistry 25 3%
Other 110 13%
Unknown 266 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 404. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2025.
All research outputs
#94,623
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#565
of 19,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,466
of 456,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#25
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.