| Title |
In the Shadow of Biological Warfare: Conspiracy Theories on the Origins of COVID-19 and Enhancing Global Governance of Biosafety as a Matter of Urgency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11673-020-10025-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 14% |
| Canada | 4 | 8% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 86% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 76 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2026.
All research outputs
#312,099
of 34,267,042 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#7
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,487
of 453,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,267,042 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.