↓ Skip to main content

Left Ventricular Assist Device Performance With Long-Term Circulatory Support: Lessons From the REMATCH Trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Left Ventricular Assist Device Performance With Long-Term Circulatory Support: Lessons From the REMATCH Trial
Published in
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, December 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Hungary 1 1%
Unknown 80 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 43%
Engineering 14 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,201,324
of 27,672,907 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#1,147
of 10,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,873
of 163,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#7
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,672,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.