↓ Skip to main content

協同的な学習に対する動機づけとピアモデリングが異学年集団での学習活動における積極的参加構造の認知に与える影響

Overview of attention for article published in Japan Journal of Educational Technology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
協同的な学習に対する動機づけとピアモデリングが異学年集団での学習活動における積極的参加構造の認知に与える影響
Published in
Japan Journal of Educational Technology, July 2019
DOI 10.15077/jjet.42134
Authors

岡田 涼

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japan Journal of Educational Technology
#186
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,805
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan Journal of Educational Technology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them