↓ Skip to main content

Wild Meat Species, Climate Change, and Indigenous Amazonians

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of ethnobiology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Wild Meat Species, Climate Change, and Indigenous Amazonians
Published in
Journal of ethnobiology, May 2023
DOI 10.2993/0278-0771-40.2.218
Authors

Richard Bodmer, Pedro Mayor, Miguel Antunez, Tula Fang, Kimberlyn Chota, Tulio Ahuanari Yuyarima, Samuel Flores, Benjamin Cosgrove, Nathaly López, Osnar Pizuri, Pablo Puertas

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 21%
Environmental Science 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2026.
All research outputs
#10,607,256
of 34,574,341 outputs
Outputs from Journal of ethnobiology
#96
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,720
of 438,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of ethnobiology
#31
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,574,341 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.