| Title |
The case for open science: rare diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMIA Open, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaffa R Rubinstein, Peter N Robinson, William A Gahl, Paul Avillach, Gareth Baynam, Helene Cederroth, Rebecca M Goodwin, Stephen C Groft, Mats G Hansson, Nomi L Harris, Vojtech Huser, Deborah Mascalzoni, Julie A McMurry, Matthew Might, Christoffer Nellaker, Barend Mons, Dina N Paltoo, Jonathan Pevsner, Manuel Posada, Alison P Rockett-Frase, Marco Roos, Tamar B Rubinstein, Domenica Taruscio, Esther van Enckevort, Melissa A Haendel |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 24% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Brazil | 3 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 67% |
| Scientists | 12 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,074,444
of 32,805,761 outputs
Outputs from JAMIA Open
#12
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,397
of 446,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMIA Open
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,805,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.