↓ Skip to main content

Investigation of hydrophobically derivatized hyperbranched polyglycerol with PEGylated shell as a nanocarrier for systemic delivery of chemotherapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Investigation of hydrophobically derivatized hyperbranched polyglycerol with PEGylated shell as a nanocarrier for systemic delivery of chemotherapeutics
Published in
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.nano.2015.04.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report the synthesis and characterization of a polymeric nanoparticle (NP) based on hyperbranched polyglycerol (HPG) containing a hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic shell, and assessed its suitability to be developed as a systemic anticancer drug carrier. HPG NP displayed low toxicity to primary cell cultures and were well-tolerated in mice after intravenous administration. When tested in mice tumor xenograft models, HPG NP accumulated significantly in the tumors with low accumulation in the liver and the spleen. In vitro studies demonstrated that HPG NP was capable of hydrophobically binding docetaxel and releasing it in a controlled manner. The HPG NP formulation of docetaxel conferred a preferential protective effect on primary non-cancerous cells while effectively killing cancer cells, indicating great potential for widening its therapeutic index. Taken together, these data indicate that HPG NP is a highly promising nanocarrier platform for systemic delivery of anticancer drugs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 29%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#24,708,050
of 27,448,938 outputs
Outputs from Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
#1,274
of 1,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,734
of 282,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,448,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.