↓ Skip to main content

Intercomparison of XRF Core Scanning Results From Seven Labs and Approaches to Practical Calibration

Overview of attention for article published in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intercomparison of XRF Core Scanning Results From Seven Labs and Approaches to Practical Calibration
Published in
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, September 2020
DOI 10.1029/2020gc009248
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Professor 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 42 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 37%
Environmental Science 11 9%
Chemistry 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 47 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,645,583
of 32,668,877 outputs
Outputs from Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
#131
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,983
of 446,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,668,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.