↓ Skip to main content

Geographic profiling as a novel spatial tool for targeting infectious disease control

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 711)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Geographic profiling as a novel spatial tool for targeting infectious disease control
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-10-35
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Geographic profiling is a statistical tool originally developed in criminology to prioritise large lists of suspects in cases of serial crime. Here, we use two data sets--one historical and one modern--to show how it can be used to locate the sources of infectious disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Czechia 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 152 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Professor 9 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Environmental Science 17 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,485,570
of 33,510,145 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#45
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,389
of 158,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,510,145 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.