↓ Skip to main content

Transdisciplinary Generalism: Naming the epistemology and philosophy of the generalist

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transdisciplinary Generalism: Naming the epistemology and philosophy of the generalist
Published in
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, September 2020
DOI 10.1111/jep.13446
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 39 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 39 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2022.
All research outputs
#11,364,855
of 34,413,214 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#780
of 1,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,680
of 442,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,413,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.