↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for standardizing nomenclature for dietary (poly)phenol catabolites

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recommendations for standardizing nomenclature for dietary (poly)phenol catabolites
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2020
DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 48 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 62 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2025.
All research outputs
#3,035,936
of 34,539,236 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#4,611
of 15,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,051
of 443,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#29
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,539,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.