Low-Dose IL-2 for Treating Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata: A 52-Week Multicenter Prospective Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing its Impact on T Regulatory Cell and NK Cell Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology, September 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 1 news outlet

twitter: 9 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 42 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Low-Dose IL-2 for Treating Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata: A 52-Week Multicenter Prospective Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing its Impact on T Regulatory Cell and NK Cell Populations
Published in	Journal of Investigative Dermatology, September 2020
DOI	10.1016/j.jid.2020.08.015
Pubmed ID	32941917
Authors	Florence Le Duff, Jean-David Bouaziz, Eric Fontas, Michel Ticchioni, Manuelle Viguier, Olivier Dereure, Pascal Reygagne, Henri Montaudié, Jean-Philippe Lacour, Sandrine Monestier, Marie-Aleth Richard, Thierry Passeron

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
France	2	22%
Unknown	7	78%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	8	89%
Scientists	1	11%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	42	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Researcher	4	10%
Other	3	7%
Student > Bachelor	3	7%
Librarian	2	5%
Student > Master	2	5%
Other	5	12%
Unknown	23	55%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Nursing and Health Professions	5	12%
Medicine and Dentistry	5	12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	3	7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	2	5%
Unspecified	1	2%
Other	2	5%
Unknown	24	57%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2025.

All research outputs

#2,736,941

of 32,440,831 outputs

Outputs from Journal of Investigative Dermatology

#759

of 10,814 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#57,063

of 446,418 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Dermatology

#11

of 96 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 32,440,831 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 10,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.