| Title |
Using BCG vaccine to enhance non-specific protection of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Denmark
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-020-04714-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Marie Rosendahl Madsen, Frederik Schaltz-Buchholzer, Thomas Benfield, Morten Bjerregaard-Andersen, Lars Skov Dalgaard, Christine Dam, Sisse Bolm Ditlev, Gulia Faizi, Isik Somuncu Johansen, Poul-Erik Kofoed, Gitte Schultz Kristensen, Ellen Christine Leth Loekkegaard, Christian Backer Mogensen, Libin Mohamed, Anne Ostenfeld, Emilie Sundhaugen Oedegaard, Marcus Kjaer Soerensen, Christian Wejse, Aksel Karl Georg Jensen, Sebastian Nielsen, Tyra Grove Krause, Mihai G. Netea, Peter Aaby, Christine Stabell Benn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 6 | 35% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 313 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
| Researcher | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 55 | 18% |
| Unknown | 112 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 122 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,466,979
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#224
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,327
of 432,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them