↓ Skip to main content

Health Inequities in Historical Context: A Critical Race Theory Analysis of Diabetes among African Americans and American Indians

Overview of attention for article published in Race and Social Problems, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health Inequities in Historical Context: A Critical Race Theory Analysis of Diabetes among African Americans and American Indians
Published in
Race and Social Problems, September 2020
DOI 10.1007/s12552-020-09301-4
Authors

Felicia M. Mitchell, Cindy Sangalang, Stephanie Lechuga-Peña, Kristina Lopez, David Beccera

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Psychology 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,346,166
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from Race and Social Problems
#159
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,092
of 403,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Race and Social Problems
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.