| Title |
Frozen Meat Against COVID-19 Misinformation: An Analysis of Steak-Umm and Positive Expectancy Violations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1050651920959187 |
| Authors |
Ekaterina Bogomoletc, Nicole M. Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 899 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 406 | 45% |
| Canada | 32 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 5 | <1% |
| Comoros | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 3% |
| Unknown | 402 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 665 | 74% |
| Scientists | 150 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 50 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 645. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#34,328
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Technical Communication
#1
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,336
of 431,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Technical Communication
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.