↓ Skip to main content

Evidence that local land use practices influence regional climate, vegetation, and stream flow patterns in adjacent natural areas

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence that local land use practices influence regional climate, vegetation, and stream flow patterns in adjacent natural areas
Published in
Global Change Biology, June 1998
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00182.x
Authors

THOMAS J. STOHLGREN, THOMAS N. CHASE, ROGER A. PIELKE, TIMOTHY G. F. KITTEL, JILL S. BARON

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 6%
Switzerland 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Malta 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 165 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 23%
Student > Master 37 20%
Researcher 26 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 78 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 15%
Engineering 10 5%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 20 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#4,935,809
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#3,968
of 5,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,698
of 34,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.