↓ Skip to main content

Why do trees die? Characterizing the drivers of background tree mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
63 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why do trees die? Characterizing the drivers of background tree mortality
Published in
Ecology, September 2016
DOI 10.1002/ecy.1497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian J. Das, Nathan L. Stephenson, Kristin P. Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Spain 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 228 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 23%
Researcher 46 19%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Professor 11 5%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 82 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 5%
Engineering 5 2%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 57 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,136,046
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#482
of 6,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,539
of 349,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#5
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.